« A.U.C. 692 = 62 B.C. »
There is no direct evidence for inferring the length of this year. However, the evidence discussed under A.U.C. 691 = 63 indicates that there is only one intercalary year between A.U.C. 696 = 58 and A.U.C. 691 = 63.
On the reconstructed Lex Acilia proposed here, A.U.C. 692 = 62 was a regular year since there were only three intercalations between A.U.C. 687 = 67 and A.U.C. 697 = 57, including A.U.C. 696 = 58. The previous intercalary year was A.U.C. 690 = 64. Had this year been intercalary the next, A.U.C. 693 = 61, would have begun with a market day on Kal. Ian. The last time this had occurred was in A.U.C. 677 = 77, and Dio Cassius 40.47 and 48.33.4 note that this event was regarded as inauspicious and to be avoided. This explains why this year was not an intercalary year.
Website © Chris Bennett, 2001-2011 -- All rights reserved